Memphis Grizzlies @ Utah Jazz
Any-day matchup · ratings as of
A probability, not a promise. A 62% pick still loses about 4 times in 10.
Advantages Why Grizzlies can win
- Recent form: average margin over the last five games, Grizzlies +12.0, Jazz -7.8.
- Recent scoring margins: worth about 4.2 points to the Grizzlies in our ratings.
- Simulation: the Grizzlies win 6,170 of 10,000 simulated games.
- Efficiency (points per 100 possessions): worth about 1.6 points to the Grizzlies in our ratings.
- The Grizzlies' shooting (53.3% eFG%, 23rd in the NBA) meets a Jazz defense that ranks 30th.
Disadvantages Why Grizzlies may not
- Upset odds: the Jazz win 3,830 of 10,000 simulations (38%). A 62% pick still loses about 4 times in 10.
- Home court: the Jazz play at home, worth about 2 points in today's NBA.
- The Jazz' shooting (53.6% eFG%, 20th in the NBA) meets a Grizzlies defense that ranks 26th.
- Range of outcomes: in the worst 10% of simulations the Grizzlies lose by 13 or more.
- Weak spot: the Grizzlies rank 29th of 30 in defensive rebounding (share of misses) (71.0%).
The line and our numbers
| Market | AZMango | |
|---|---|---|
| Spread | No line yet | MEM -4.1 |
| Total points | n/a | 234.2 |
| Win chance | MEM n/a · UTA n/a | MEM 62% · UTA 38% |
| Fair moneyline | MEM -161 · UTA +161 |
No betting line for this pairing. Odds change all the time, so check a sportsbook before acting on any number here.
10,000 simulated games, possession by possession
- Typical score: Jazz 115, Grizzlies 119.
- 80% of simulations land between Grizzlies by 20 and Jazz by 13.
Side by side
| MEM | UTA | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-0 | Record | 1-4 |
| -4.8 22 | Net rating | -7.9 27 |
| 110.2 23 | Offensive rating | 111.1 20 |
| 114.9 22 | Defensive rating | 119.0 29 |
| 53.3% 23 | Effective FG% | 53.6% 20 |
| 55.8% 26 | Opponent eFG% | 57.6% 30 |
| 14.5 18 | Turnovers per 100 | 14.8 21 |
| 25.2% 17 | Offensive rebound % | 26.3% 12 |
| 35.5% 17 | 3-point % | 34.4% 24 |
| 104.3 7 | Pace | 105.6 2 |
Small numbers are league ranks (1 = best of 30; pace 1 = fastest). Ratings are points per 100 possessions (2025-26 and 2026-27 seasons).
Last 5 meetings
| Date | Season | Score | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-26 | 2026-27 | MEM 110 @ UTA 105 | MEM |
| 2026-10-21 | 2026-27 | UTA 103 @ MEM 123 | MEM |
| 2026-04-10 | 2025-26 | MEM 101 @ UTA 147 | UTA |
| 2026-02-20 | 2025-26 | UTA 114 @ MEM 123 | MEM |
| 2025-12-23 | 2025-26 | MEM 137 @ UTA 128 | MEM |
No betting line exists for a game that isn't scheduled, so this uses our own power ratings (in the backtest they pick about 66% of winners, against about 68% for the closing line), with both teams at full strength.
Basis: power ratings only (no betting line yet). 10,000 simulated games, checked against a walk-forward backtest of 10,227 NBA games since 2018-19. Model version 1. How it works