Queens University @ Alabama
Women's college basketball 2026-27 · ASUN vs SEC · · Coleman Coliseum
- Queens University Schedule and results
- Alabama Schedule and results
Game day
No over/under posted yet · our projected total 130.7
- Tip-off
A probability, not a promise. A 92% pick still loses about 1 time in 10.
Advantages Why Alabama can win
- Recent scoring margins: worth about 6.5 points to Alabama in our ratings.
- Simulation: Alabama win 4,595 of 5,000 simulated games.
- Net rating (points per 100 possessions): Alabama 67th (+12.1), Queens University 321st (-16.8) of 364.
- Alabama's offense (100.9 points per 100 possessions, 51st in Division I) meets a Queens University defense that ranks 278th.
- Home court: Alabama play at home, worth about 3.5 points in women's college basketball.
- Team matchup: where Alabama can take advantage. Their shooting efficiency (27th of 364) meets the Queens University shooting defense (308th), so look for them to get clean looks against a defense that gives them up.
- Star matchup: Best player against best player, Jessica Timmons (Alabama: 16.3 pts, 4.5 reb, 2.3 ast, Game Score 10.7) has the edge on Brenae Jones-Grant (Queens University: 8.5 pts, 6.2 reb, 0.8 ast, Game Score 7.7).
Disadvantages Why Alabama may not
- Upset odds: Queens University win 405 of 5,000 simulations (8%). A 92% pick still loses about 1 time in 10.
- Shooting variance: one hot or cold night from three swings college games by 10 points or more.
- Who plays: women's college basketball has no league-wide injury report, so a late absence can arrive at tip-off.
- Young rosters: freshmen and transfers can change a team's level from one month to the next.
- Small samples: early-season numbers come from a handful of games against very different opponents.
- Team matchup: Queens University have no clear unit-against-unit edge, so their path runs through a hot shooting night or a cold one from the favorite.
- Star matchup: the key positions lean Alabama on paper, but Brenae Jones-Grant (8.5 pts, 6.2 reb, 0.8 ast, Game Score 7.7) is the kind of player who can swing one game.
🥭 Mango Sliced Facts
Ask about this matchup. Answers come only from the numbers on this page.
Loading…
Sign in or create a free account to ask.
An AI reads this page for you and can get things wrong; the numbers above are the source. Not betting advice.
Team news
Loading the latest headlines...
Headlines from ESPN and CBS Sports, each linked to the full story. Injuries, lineups, suspensions and coaching news come first. We leave out rumors, gossip about players' private lives and betting promos.
The line and our numbers
| Market | AZMango | |
|---|---|---|
| Spread | No line yet | ALA -16.1 |
| Total points | n/a | 130.7 |
| Win chance | QUC n/a · ALA n/a | QUC 8% · ALA 92% |
| Moneyline | QUC +1129 · ALA -1129 (fair) |
No betting line has been posted for this game yet. Sportsbooks post lines for many women's college games only on game day, and smaller-conference games often get none at all. Books also take a line down for a while when a key player's status is unclear. We check ESPN's lines before each day's games and add the line as soon as there is one. Odds change all the time, so check a sportsbook before acting on any number here.
5,000 simulated games, possession by possession
- Typical score: Alabama 83, Queens University 67.
- 80% of simulations land between Alabama by 1 and Alabama by 32.
Still out?
Women's college basketball has no league-wide injury report, so we show what a fan can know before tip-off: regulars who sat out each team's last game. Our model counts them as likely out, exactly as it did in the backtest.
QUC Queens University
Every regular played last game.
ALA Alabama
Every regular played last game.
Check the team's own news before the game; players return and new absences appear at tip-off.
Also checked (ESPN and CBS Sports news): nothing beyond the report.
Side by side
| QUC | ALA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| -16.8 321 | Net rating | +12.1 67 |
| 79.8 327 | Offensive rating | 100.9 51 |
| 96.6 278 | Defensive rating | 88.7 115 |
| -0.7 300 | Strength of schedule | +3.0 8 |
| 40.7% 321 | Effective FG% | 51.3% 27 |
| 48.8% 308 | Opponent eFG% | 43.3% 53 |
| 24.2 251 | Turnovers per 100 | 21.5 123 |
| 28.2% 275 | Offensive rebound % | 30.0% 220 |
| 30.2% 192 | 3-point % | 36.4% 12 |
| 71.8 150 | Pace | 69.4 266 |
Small numbers are ranks among 364 Division I teams (1 = best; pace 1 = fastest). Ratings are points per 100 possessions; strength of schedule is the average rating of opponents faced (2025-26 season and this season so far).
Last 5 meetings
These teams have not met since 2009.
Your pick
Make your pick before kickoff and see how you stack up against the Mango. Challenge a friend on this game · All picks · Leaderboard
What if?
Change the game and see how the chances move. This starts from our number and shifts the expected margin, using how much real results scatter around the line (12 points in a typical NCAAW game).
Our number. Move the slider or flip a player.
Game chat
Sign in or create a free account to chat.
Be a good sport: no threats, hate, personal details or spam. Open the full chat
Basis: power ratings only (no betting line yet). 5,000 simulated games, checked against a walk-forward backtest of 11,204 Division I games since 2020-21. Model version 1. How it works