- Seattle U Schedule and results
- New Mexico Schedule and results
Game day
No over/under posted yet · our projected total 132.8
- Tip-off
A probability, not a promise. A 94% pick still loses about 1 time in 10.
Advantages Why New Mexico can win
- Recent scoring margins: worth about 9.7 points to New Mexico in our ratings.
- Simulation: New Mexico win 4,700 of 5,000 simulated games.
- Net rating (points per 100 possessions): New Mexico 81st (+9.5), Seattle U 354th (-26.4) of 364.
- New Mexico's offense (96.1 points per 100 possessions, 115th in Division I) meets a Seattle U defense that ranks 354th.
- Efficiency (points per 100 possessions): worth about 2.9 points to New Mexico in our ratings.
- Team matchup: where New Mexico can take advantage. Their offensive rebounding (80th of 364) meets the Seattle U defensive rebounding (314th), so look for them to crash the glass for second chances. And their shooting efficiency (133rd of 364) meets the Seattle U shooting defense (346th): a chance to get clean looks against a defense that gives them up.
- Star matchup: no key position clearly favors New Mexico. The closest: at forward, Tamia Stricklin (Seattle U: 10.4 pts, 6.4 reb, 1.8 ast, Game Score 6.4) is about even with Clarissa Craig (New Mexico: 6.5 pts, 4.3 reb, 0.6 ast, Game Score 5.7).
Disadvantages Why New Mexico may not
- Upset odds: Seattle U win 300 of 5,000 simulations (6%). A 94% pick still loses about 1 time in 10.
- Season-long ratings: betting lines have rated Seattle U about 0.8 points stronger over recent games.
- Weak spot: New Mexico rank 336th of 364 in strength of schedule (-1.1).
- Weak spot: New Mexico rank 333rd of 364 in getting to the line (free throws per shot) (0.16).
- Getting to the line (free throws per shot): Seattle U 204th (0.20), New Mexico 333rd (0.16) of 364.
- Team matchup: Seattle U have no clear unit-against-unit edge, so their path runs through a hot shooting night or a cold one from the favorite.
- Star matchup: Best player against best player, Ella Brubaker (Seattle U: 15.8 pts, 4.4 reb, 1.2 ast, Game Score 10.4) has the edge on Cacia Antonio (New Mexico: 10.3 pts, 5.2 reb, 1.6 ast, Game Score 6.9).
🥭 Mango Sliced Facts
Ask about this matchup. Answers come only from the numbers on this page.
Loading…
Sign in or create a free account to ask.
An AI reads this page for you and can get things wrong; the numbers above are the source. Not betting advice.
Team news
Loading the latest headlines...
Headlines from ESPN and CBS Sports, each linked to the full story. Injuries, lineups, suspensions and coaching news come first. We leave out rumors, gossip about players' private lives and betting promos.
The line and our numbers
| Market | AZMango | |
|---|---|---|
| Spread | No line yet | UNM -18.2 |
| Total points | n/a | 132.8 |
| Win chance | SEA n/a · UNM n/a | SEA 6% · UNM 94% |
| Moneyline | SEA +1554 · UNM -1554 (fair) |
No betting line has been posted for this game yet. Sportsbooks post lines for many women's college games only on game day, and smaller-conference games often get none at all. Books also take a line down for a while when a key player's status is unclear. We check ESPN's lines before each day's games and add the line as soon as there is one. Odds change all the time, so check a sportsbook before acting on any number here.
5,000 simulated games, possession by possession
- Typical score: New Mexico 84, Seattle U 66.
- 80% of simulations land between New Mexico by 2 and New Mexico by 34.
Still out?
Women's college basketball has no league-wide injury report, so we show what a fan can know before tip-off: regulars who sat out each team's last game. Our model counts them as likely out, exactly as it did in the backtest.
SEA Seattle U
Every regular played last game.
UNM New Mexico
Every regular played last game.
Check the team's own news before the game; players return and new absences appear at tip-off.
Also checked (ESPN and CBS Sports news): nothing beyond the report.
Side by side
| SEA | UNM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| -26.4 354 | Net rating | +9.5 81 |
| 79.6 330 | Offensive rating | 96.1 115 |
| 106.0 354 | Defensive rating | 86.6 65 |
| -0.6 269 | Strength of schedule | -1.1 336 |
| 41.4% 308 | Effective FG% | 46.5% 133 |
| 50.5% 346 | Opponent eFG% | 44.9% 142 |
| 24.5 256 | Turnovers per 100 | 21.0 108 |
| 23.3% 344 | Offensive rebound % | 34.6% 80 |
| 26.9% 320 | 3-point % | 30.7% 171 |
| 73.6 76 | Pace | 70.1 234 |
Small numbers are ranks among 364 Division I teams (1 = best; pace 1 = fastest). Ratings are points per 100 possessions; strength of schedule is the average rating of opponents faced (2025-26 season and this season so far).
Last 5 meetings
These teams have not met since 2009.
Your pick
Make your pick before kickoff and see how you stack up against the Mango. Challenge a friend on this game · All picks · Leaderboard
What if?
Change the game and see how the chances move. This starts from our number and shifts the expected margin, using how much real results scatter around the line (12 points in a typical NCAAW game).
Our number. Move the slider or flip a player.
Game chat
Sign in or create a free account to chat.
Be a good sport: no threats, hate, personal details or spam. Open the full chat
Basis: power ratings only (no betting line yet). 5,000 simulated games, checked against a walk-forward backtest of 11,204 Division I games since 2020-21. Model version 1. How it works